TWO-FAMILY HOUSE, 1986-1989

Pullach, Germany

Herzog + Partners

Description

Despite its High-Tech look of glass on laminated wood frame with steel tie cross bracing, this house has its beginnings in the traditional Alpine timber frame barn. Like its vernacular precedent, the Pullach house starts with an elegantly small substructure and cantilevers out­ward, like Eames House, at each successive upper level. The roof becomes a huge overhanging form in compar­ison to the thin proportions of its base. A relatively small and well-protected structure rests beneath the sheltering eaves.

The vernacular barn uses this outwardly cascading form defensively to keep its wood frame and rough board cladding dry and covered. Structurally, the scheme pro­vides an economy of support and cantilevered spans. Thomas Herzog acknowledges this as a formally appropri­ate beginning point and then opens up a series of complex interactions with the climate via technical components and Modernist ambitions. Glass is used wherever possible, then solar collector panels are strategically integrated as insulated wall wherever privacy dictates an opaque barri­er. There is an exposed industrial wood structure, a galva­nized metal screen for climbing summer vines on the south, and a corrugated metal roof that turns to glass beyond the exterior wall line to become a broad and trans­parent rain canopy.

TABLE 9.7 Fact Sheet

Project

Building Name

Client

City

Lat/Long/Elev

Two-Family House Private

Pullach, Germany

48.13 N 11.70 E, 1736 ft (529 m)

Team

Architect

Engineer

Energy

Thomas Herzog, Michael Volz, Michael Streib

Structure: Jullus Natterer

Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Systems, Freiburg

General

Time Line

Floor Area

Occupants

Cost

Stories

Plan

1986-1989.

2475 ft2 (230 m2) including basement of 642 ft2 (59.6 m2).

Two families.

Not available.

Two plus partial basement.

Pavilion-style long rectangle, one room deep with perimeter circulation.

Site

Site Description Parking, Cars

Open meadow to south with trees to north. Two-car covered parking.

Structure

Foundation Vertical Members Horizontal Spans

Basement with pier and beam.

Laminated timber columns in 5.9 in. x 5.9 in. (150 x 150 mm) and 2.0 in. x 5.9 in. (60 x 150 mm) sizes. Laminated wood beams at 11.8 ft (360 cm) centers across the long east-to-west axis.

Envelope

Glass and Glazing Skylights Cladding Roof

Double glazing with laminated inner lites.

Sloped glazing at second-story exterior wall on north and south.

6.0 in. (150 mm) insulation clad on both faces with cementitious chipboard. Corrugated metal roof with laminated glass overhanging eaves.

HVAC

Equipment Cooling Type Distribution Duct Type Vertical Chases

Radiant heating from boiler in basement.

None.

Radiant heat with heat recovery ventilation.

Exposed round metal duct at second story.

Central core of 11.8 in. (300 mm) reserved for services.

Interior

Partitions

Finishes

Vertical Circulation Lighting

Wood frame.

Exposed wood frame, glass, and gypsum board. Stairs.

Daylighting and task lamps.

Corrugated metal roof with laminated glass

Figure 9.22 Anatomical section.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Year

Degree-Days Heating

1073

937

780

612

347

188

92

100

236

532

810

1006

6701

Temperature

Degree-Days Cooling

0

0

0

0

1

16

51

50

9

0

0

0

130

Extreme High

63

70

74

80

86

93

97

95

86

79

66

69

97

Normal High

36

38

48

53

63

68

72

73

66

55

44

38

55

Normal Average

30

32

40

45

54

59

64

63

57

48

38

33

47

Normal Low

24

25

32

36

44

50

54

54

48

40

32

27

39

Extreme Low

-16

-9

4

21

27

36

39

39

32

21

6

-6

-16

Dew Point

26

26

32

35

44

50

53

53

49

42

33

28

39

Humidity

Max % RH

88

90

87

86

84

85

84

89

91

92

90

89

88

Min % RH

80

74

62

57

55

58

55

55

61

71

80

81

66

% Days with Rain

47

37

51

63

68

73

64

62

55

57

54

49

56

Rain Inches

2

2

2

3

4

5

5

4

3

2

2

2

37

Sky

% Overcast Days

38

33

29

28

22

22

17

16

19

28

35

37

27

% Clear Days

10

15

11

11

10

6

12

16

14

12

9

8

11

Wind

Prevailing Direction

WSW

WSW

WSW

WSW

E

WSW

WSW

WSW

WSW

WSW

WSW

WSW

WSW

Speed, Knots

14

12

12

10

7

9

9

8

9

10

12

13

10

Percent Calm

5

5

3

2

3

3

4

5

5

5

5

4

4

Rain

14

11

15

19

21

22

19

19

17

17

16

15

205

Days Observed

Fog

17

19

15

12

11

12

10

15

17

20

18

16

182

Haze

2

7

7

4

3

2

2

4

5

4

2

1

44

Snow

15

14

10

8

1

0

0

0

0

1

9

13

69

Hail

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Freezing Rain

2

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

5

Blowing Sand

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

table 9.8 Normal Climate Data for Pullach

Program

Client and Brief

The client for this project requested a two-family house in wood frame. Emphasis on energy efficiency and moderate construction cost were also given as criteria. No other information has been made public.

Site

The site occupies a long east-to-west strip of land bor­dered on the north by large evergreen trees. The rest of the site is open.

Climate

Pullach is a southside suburb of Munich and is well described by the larger city’s climate data. The general region, Southern Bavaria, lies in the south catchment of the Danube River. Pullach specifically is 40 miles north of the Austrian border, a great barrier formed by the north face of the Alps mountain range. The climate is character­ized by cool, temperate weather and a degree of inland continentality. Conditions are generally mild but quite variable from season to season and year to year. The aver­age daily high in August is 73°F, and the average daily low in January is 30°F. Cold weather often coincides with long periods of low, gray, overcast skies; there are only 55 hours of sun in the month of December and 28 in all of January.

A degree-day ratio of 6701 heating to 130 cooling gen­eralizes the temperate, cool conditions of Munich. The cli­mate resembles that of Chicago, Illinois. Measurable rainfall occurs on more than half of the annual days as does fog. There is no dry season, and April through August are the wettest months in both frequency and total precip­itation. From November to April there are normally 69

30

25

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JLY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

RAIN

SNOW

–Ж BLOWING SAND

FOG

HAIL

HAZE – FREEZING RAIN

Figure 9.24 Climate analysis graphics.

days of snowfall, corresponding with the months when normal daily low temperatures are below freezing. Clear weather occurs on about 11 percent of annual days with no clear relationship to temperature. Winds are generally from the WSW and calm only 4 percent of the time. Summer breezes are particularly generous.

Intention

Design Team

Thomas Herzog practices architecture from a strong aca­demic and research base. After completing a diploma of architecture at the Technical University of Munich in 1965, he received his doctorate in architecture from the

University of Rome in 1972. Dr. Herzog became the chair for Design and Building Technology at the Technical University of Darmstadt in 1986 and chair for Design and Building Construction at the Technical University of Munich in 1993. Along the way, he has worked for the European Commission, the policy initiative arm of the European Union, and championed solar architecture at several other European organizations. His more recent work includes the Wikahn Furniture Factory (1992), Linz Design Center (1993), Expo Hall 26 at the Hanover Trade Fair (1996), and a collaboration with Sir Norman Foster for a solar village at Regensburg, Germany (1998) for the European Commission.

Herzog’s work has been a continuing series of part­nerships and collaborations. He approaches each project

Dry-Bulb Temperature, °F

Figure 9.25 Bin data distribution for Munich. Concentric areas of graph indicate the number of hours per year that weather conditions normally occur in this climate. Similar to elevation readings on topographic maps, highest frequency occurrences of weather are at the center peaks of the graph. (Data sources: Engineering Weather Data, typical meteorological year (TMY) data from the National Climatic Data Center, and the ASHRAE Weather Data Viewer from the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.)

as a prototype design for state-of-the-art technology, and this research and development requires teamwork. Since 1981 he has worked hand in hand with the Freiburg Institute of Energy Research, because he says, “no architect can ever master all the forces at work on solar buildings." He believes in the necessity and synergistic effect of multi­disciplinary teams. His partner for the Pullach House was Michael Volz, with assistance from Michael Streib. Structural engineering was provided by Jullus Natterer. Herzog, Volz, and Natterer have also cowritten a book on timber structures.

philosophy

The emphasis on research and development in Herzog’s academic pursuits find Modernist expression in his pro­fessional practice. He constantly experiments and seeks to apply the best and most advanced technologies to the serv­ice of his buildings. For him, Modernist architecture is still involved in the transition from the 1970s attitude whereby energy efficiency was sacrificed to achieve visual state­ments of material minimalism. Herzog sees the emerging role of Modern architecture as just the opposite—using new materials and configurations to exploit a building’s functional relationship with the environment. This evolu­tion is evident in his own career as well. After following in the footsteps of Frei Otto and publishing his much trans­lated doctoral dissertation Pneumatic Constructions, Herzog has essentially abandoned lightweight minimalist envelope solutions in favor of far more proactive and envi­ronmentally sophisticated techniques.

Intent

Specific statements about design intentions for this project have not been identified, and the architect has been care­ful to protect his client’s privacy. From the philosophical statements and lineage of Herzog’s practice and research, however, a few ideas can be identified in the finished building. Primarily, this building was to utilize cutting – edge technology, with provisions for uptake of new tech­nologies as they emerged into practical application.

Updated: 9th October 2014 — 11:43 pm